Two Visions of the Future
i
Illustration by Tomek Kozłowski
Dreams and Visions

Two Visions of the Future

Aldous Huxley’s Dystopia and Utopia
Tomasz Wiśniewski
Reading
time 9 minutes

It’s rare for one and the same author to create both a dystopia and utopia. It is exceptionally rare for both works to be renowned and withstand the test of time. It seems that only a single such case is known in the work of Aldous Huxley.

Published in 1932, Brave New World continues to prompt and alert readers’ awareness toward trends observed today. Another novel—Island—still inspires those who see a silver lining. As a writer, Huxley did not make the ordinary evolution from optimism to pessimism, and driven by the concerns of an old-fashioned intellectual engaged in world matters, he did not turn to catastrophic bitterness.

Wolves, Not Termites

When it comes to the anxieties triggered by Brave New World, at the core of its vision is a unified social world without any room for individualism or dissent. The model here is a society imagined as an anthill or a beehive, while the human species—at least according to Huxley—is more like that of elephants or wolves. We need some kind of a group but are never a part of one organism or an interchangeable piece of a whole. 

As a result of this infinitely complex evolutionary process, each one of us is different and must remain that way, or else will be made unhappy. The more or less anonymous forces that rule the world are capable of tricking us into forgetting this fact. This is how unifying human intellect is—enabling the possibility to “control” the world.

Information

You’ve reached your free article’s limit this month. You can get unlimited access to all our articles and audio content with our digital subscription. If you have an active subscription, please log in.

Subscribe

Also read:

Challenging Cities
i
“Nighthawks”, Edward Hopper, 1942, Art Institute of Chicago
Dreams and Visions, Experiences

Challenging Cities

Visions of Urban Utopia
Paulina Wilk

It doesn’t matter who dreamed them up: a fantasist, thoughtful scientist, idealist or corporation. Nor does it matter whether there was a happy outcome. The boldest visions of future cities – cities that were never built – were driven by desire. And they never became reality because we simply didn’t want it badly enough.

The ‘city of the future’ is a challenge, not a promise. The creation of tomorrow heralds changes, a reconstructed life – and change is always followed by fear. Because in this new world, we’d have to be different, too. The most famous architects of future urban landscapes all seem to have had the same blind spot – they failed to appreciate the extent of human anxiety and attachment to what’s already there. Futurists believe that change is possible and they want to be the ones setting its course. We know that change is unavoidable, and we often prefer to go with the flow rather than actively participate in designing it.

Continue reading